First off, let me share a little something about myself that you might find a little odd. I don’t have TV. Due to personal reasons, we had to give up cable TV over two years ago. I know, right? How can we live without TV? Well, we can.
While I often whine and complain about wanting TV — even NEEDING TV — I have other methods that I use to watch a very limited amount of TV legally. What I’m talking about is streaming. If you’re a computer novice, odds are you’re likely clueless as to what exactly streaming is, or your idea of streaming is limited to YouTube. You’re missing out on a great deal if that is the case.
You can stream just about anything online, and there are free solutions that enable you to even broadcast your own streams and share with friends and family, or privately to yourself when you’re not at home. In my opinion, streaming has so much more to offer than it currently does and deserves to be thrust into the spotlight on a whole new level. It deserves development and exploration, and above all it needs to be a free service provided by your ISP’s (Internet Service Providers) at no extra cost to you.
The United States is about to make the digital switch, which will cease analog broadcasts. Very few people in the U.S. use antennas anymore for signals, and almost everyone has a computer and most have access to broadband internet connections. What do you think the next step should be? Streaming. Networks such as ABC, NBC, Fox, CBS and so on should provide a free access online LIVE stream of their channels for everyone in the U.S.
Why should the streams be free? Because there is no difference between an online stream that is free, and an analog signal picked up by an antenna which is also free to everyone in the U.S. within range. One is on the computer, and the other is on the TV.
Big networks currently offer, in one way or another, a VoD (Video on Demand) streaming method found at their sites where you can stream entire episodes of a show they’ve aired online on your computer. But very few offer a truly live stream of their channel online to watch in realtime. That is one thing that you really give up when you try to switch to stream-only viewing.
Some events are simulcasted online such as sports through ESPN360.com, which allows you — provided you have access courtesy of your ISP — to stream live college football games among other sporting events such as soccer, baseball, NASCAR, tennis, hockey, and other assorted sporting events. The problem with ESPN360.com however, is that its options are extremely limited. Allow me to explain.
While you get to watch the game “live”, you have a a delay that rivals a satellite broadcast and odds are you’ll hear people around you cheering for touchdowns up to 2 minutes before you get to see the action yourself. It also fails to provide proper support and can lag you to death when using a much superior internet browser in Firefox, compared to a more smoother experience in a much less liked browser in Internet Explorer.
Your viewing ability is limited as well. While it claims “fullscreen”, it will maintain a windowed version of the video. It fails to provide a true fullscreen option, something that is very easy to do and would boost end-user enjoyment by leaps and bounds. The user interface also is very dated looking, and at times breaks in Internet Explorer. The “Go Live” button’s text will suddenly appear below the red button background. I don’t think that’s supposed to happen.
But this is why I spoke about it needing development, and to be given the attention it deserves. It would be a wonderful solution for the big networks because with internet streaming, you have the ability to use interactive commercials. Streaming websites have timed, matching commercials and advertisements, that’ll bring up matching ads that you can click on, or even interact with that’ll take you to the products website for more information, while not affecting the stream you’re watching or listening to.
It could revolutionize what you know as a commercial, and perhaps one day enable you to “test drive” a car they’re pushing to you in an advertisement, and you could get a little enjoyment out of a commercial rather than it just being a video playing that you use as an excuse to take a bathroom break.
Streaming is more interactive, more personal, and can bring many more things to the table than a normal TV broadcast. Need more examples? Imagine this. You’re watching let’s say.. Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. Bored? Play along! You could scroll your mouse to the bottom of the video, and an interactive menu could slide up, listing the answers you’re allowed to choose. You can pick the answer you want, and so can the rest of the country. Next thing you know, they could offer a live scrollbar showing what others are choosing, and it makes TV truly interactive. A game show becomes a game for everyone, not just something to watch but to ENJOY. Polls can be conducted instantly by popping up on someones stream, and they could easily press their choice and move on. News broadcasts wanting viewers feedback? Boom, already got it.
There are finally some companies making a statement by offering streaming TV. Verizon FiOS and AT&T’s U-Verse, to name a couple, but could be improved greatly if the options were provided directly from the networks themselves online from their websites. Keeping their channels free, like they should be.
Earlier I spoke of VoD features, which the networks offer so you can stream episodes on demand, which is a good feature. There are other websites that provide non-network unique shows, such as Comcast’s Fancast.com site, which archives multiple shows and provides them via streaming for VoD. It’s a good site for network shows, but is lacking in video picture quality — another issue plaguing online streaming.
Now I can’t do an article about streaming without mentioning audio streaming. Internet Radio is an amazing thing. Odds are if you give internet radio a chance — just once — you’ll be hooked and you’ll fear switching on your FM radio stations again. Internet Radio has been in a nasty battle, in which record labels want to effectively kill it off because they want more money, and most internet radio stations are incapable of paying the amounts the record labels and more notably the CRB (Copyright Royalties Board) want to allow internet radio broadcasters to continue playing their music.
What makes internet radio better than FM radio is audio quality, less annoying ads, and more genre oriented playlists. You get to pick a station that’ll play the music you know you’ll like, and hear more music of the same that you might not have heard before and could easily find yourself discovering a couple new bands that you enjoy.
It is a wonderful thing, and provides great freedom for the listeners and the artists alike. It doesn’t matter is you’re an award winning artist, or a local band looking to get discovered — you have a chance at hearing all of the above and so much more.
The leading method in my personal opinion to get internet radio is through Winamp’s SHOUTcast which provides CD quality audio streaming directly to your PC and thousands of stations to choose from. They also provide their streaming software for free, and you could setup your own internet radio broadcast.
There is another side of streaming that is often overlooked. Self streaming. Ever go on a business trip or vacation and you have access to a computer, but not your computer? Streaming programs like Orb can allow you to stream video, audio, live TV and so many other things for free directly from your PC to all sorts of devices including your cellphone, laptop, PC, XBox 360 and PlayStation 3.
Streaming is the future, and the future is looking bright.
EDIT: In response to the comment below for this post, I’ve felt the need and taken it upon myself to provide a sample of a Fancast streams image quality.
Clearly the quality needs improvement, but it is watchable and better than nothing. Plus it is free, so there is no sense in complaining over it and I’m not. I’m just saying that sites like Fancast can easily improve their streaming quality. Don’t believe me? Let’s not forget about the greatness that once was Stage6 and its usage of the DivX Flash Player. It was virtually lossless, and was insanely beautiful in clarity compared to original video sources. What was uploaded is what you got in the stream.
Tags: News, Online Streaming, Tech